Categories
Delhi News

Cbi: CBI files chargesheet against Congress’ Jagdish Tytler in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case | India News


NEW DELHI: The CBI on Saturday filed a chargesheet against senior Congress leader Jagdish Tytler in connection with a case in North Delhi pertaining to the anti-Sikh riots in 1984.
Three people were killed when a gurudwara was set on fire in the Bara Hindu Rao area of the capital on November 1 of that year.
The Congress leader has been charged with a range of offences, including rioting, abetting murder and violating prohibitory orders.
The CBI had registered this case on November 22, 2005. The chargesheet has been filed almost four decades after the incident and nearly 18 years after the case was lodged in the matter.
The riots had broken out following the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on October 31.

‘Accused instigated, incited, provoked mob during riots’
This particular case in which the chargesheet has been filed pertained to an incident wherein Gurudwara Pul Bangash at Azad Market in Bara Hindu Rao locality of North Delhi was set on fire by a mob and three persons – Sardar Thakur Singh, Badal Singh and Gurcharan Singh – were burnt to death on November 1, 1984, officials said.
“Justice Nanavati Commission of Inquiry was set up in the year 2000 by the Government of India to enquire into the incidents of anti-Sikh riots of the year 1984 in Delhi. After consideration of the Commission’s report, the Union home ministry had issued directions to CBI to investigate the case against then Member of Parliament and others,” said a CBI spokesperson.
During CBI’s investigation, evidences came on record that the accused allegedly instigated, incited and provoked the mob assembled at Gurudwara Pul Bangash which resulted in burning of the gurudwara and killing of three Sikh persons by the mob, apart from burning and looting of shops.
“After a thorough and pain-staking investigation, a chargesheet has been filed on Saturday,” the spokesperson added. The charge sheet was filed in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM), Rouse Avenue District Court. The court will consider the charges on June 2.
CBI has filed the chargesheet under IPC sections 109 read with 302 (abetment to murder), 147/148 (rioting with a deadly weapon), 149 (member of an unlawful assembly), 153-A (spreading communal disharmony), 188 (disobedience of prohibitory order), 295 (defiling a place of worship) 436 (mischief by fire or explosive).
On April 11 this year, the agency had recorded Tytler’s voice samples in the case to match it from the voice from a sting operation video/audio clip submitted to it. The CBI had filed a closure report against Tytler earlier but the sessions court did not accept it. An accused named Suresh Kumar was acquitted in 2014 due to lack of evidence. In 2018, CBI had stumbled on some tapes from a businessman wherein it was claimed that Tytler in a sting operation had purportedly claimed he was involved in 1984 anti Sikh riots. The cops then started taking a fresh look at the case.

function loadGtagEvents(isGoogleCampaignActive) { if (!isGoogleCampaignActive) { return; } var id = document.getElementById('toi-plus-google-campaign'); if (id) { return; } (function(f, b, e, v, n, t, s) { t = b.createElement(e); t.async = !0; t.defer = !0; t.src = v; t.id = 'toi-plus-google-campaign'; s = b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s); })(f, b, e, 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-877820074', n, t, s); };

window.TimesApps = window.TimesApps || {}; var TimesApps = window.TimesApps; TimesApps.toiPlusEvents = function(config) { var isConfigAvailable = "toiplus_site_settings" in f && "isFBCampaignActive" in f.toiplus_site_settings && "isGoogleCampaignActive" in f.toiplus_site_settings; var isPrimeUser = window.isPrime; if (isConfigAvailable && !isPrimeUser) { loadGtagEvents(f.toiplus_site_settings.isGoogleCampaignActive); loadFBEvents(f.toiplus_site_settings.isFBCampaignActive); } else { var JarvisUrl="https://jarvis.indiatimes.com/v1/feeds/toi_plus/site_settings/643526e21443833f0c454615?db_env=published"; window.getFromClient(JarvisUrl, function(config){ if (config) { loadGtagEvents(config?.isGoogleCampaignActive); loadFBEvents(config?.isFBCampaignActive); } }) } }; })( window, document, 'script', );



Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Best Tax Saving Investments: Going for new tax regime? Don’t go off these tax-savers | India News



Last month, salaried taxpayers had to choose between the old and new tax regimes. Most tax deductions are not available under the new tax regime, so those who have chosen to go with the new regime may be thinking of discontinuing the tax saving investments they started in previous years. However, some of these investments should not be stopped just because there is no tax benefit. They may be serving other critical purposes in your financial plan.
PPF: Continue investing to build tax-free corpus
In the past few years, many investment options have moved into the tax net but the PPF remains completely tax-free. The small savings scheme is a good way to build a retirement corpus that earns tax-free interest and is tax-exempt on maturity. If you have investible surplus, keep investing in this tax-advantaged scheme.
Term insurance: Keep paying the premium for protection
Life insurance is not bought to save tax, but is meant to provide financial support if the policy-holder dies. This is especially true for pure protection term insurance plans that give a large cover at a low price. Even if there is no tax benefit on the premium, do not stop paying the premium of your term insurance policy.

Old vs new tax regime: Why PPF, insurance, ULIPs, ELSS still matter | Investment tips

Medical insurance: Continue this critical cover irrespective of tax benefit
Continuing this cover is just as important as the term insurance policy. Don’t stop your medical cover because there is no deduction for the premium. As Covid showed us two years ago, the absenceof medical insurance can ruin a household’s finances.
NPS: Invest under sections that offer tax benefits
Even though there is no deduction under Section 80C under the new tax regime, the contributions to NPS under Section 80CCD(2) will continue to enjoy tax benefits. If you have opted for the NPS through your employer, continue contributing to the scheme to get the tax benefit.
ELSS funds: Stop SIPs and move to regular funds
This is one tax saving investment you can stop if you move to the new tax regime. Instead of putting money in a fund with a three-year lock-in period, you can invest in a regular equity diversified fund.
Traditional insurance plans: Consider surrendering or turning paid up
Insurance policies you bought to save tax may not be very useful now. Policies that have completed three years can be surrendered or turned into paid-up plans.
Do this for plans that still have several years to maturity. If maturity is just 3-4 years away, it’s better to paythe premium in full.
NSCs and tax-saving FDs: Avoid locking money in illiquid options
The interest rates of these fixed income options have risen in recent months. Even so, they should be avoided due to the low liquidity they offer. Instead, you can invest in bank deposits of 1-2 years which can be prematurely closed if required.
The author is CEO and founder of tax filing portal Taxspanner. com

function loadGtagEvents(isGoogleCampaignActive) { if (!isGoogleCampaignActive) { return; } var id = document.getElementById('toi-plus-google-campaign'); if (id) { return; } (function(f, b, e, v, n, t, s) { t = b.createElement(e); t.async = !0; t.defer = !0; t.src = v; t.id = 'toi-plus-google-campaign'; s = b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s); })(f, b, e, 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-877820074', n, t, s); };

window.TimesApps = window.TimesApps || {}; var TimesApps = window.TimesApps; TimesApps.toiPlusEvents = function(config) { var isConfigAvailable = "toiplus_site_settings" in f && "isFBCampaignActive" in f.toiplus_site_settings && "isGoogleCampaignActive" in f.toiplus_site_settings; var isPrimeUser = window.isPrime; if (isConfigAvailable && !isPrimeUser) { loadGtagEvents(f.toiplus_site_settings.isGoogleCampaignActive); loadFBEvents(f.toiplus_site_settings.isFBCampaignActive); } else { var JarvisUrl="https://jarvis.indiatimes.com/v1/feeds/toi_plus/site_settings/643526e21443833f0c454615?db_env=published"; window.getFromClient(JarvisUrl, function(config){ if (config) { loadGtagEvents(config?.isGoogleCampaignActive); loadFBEvents(config?.isFBCampaignActive); } }) } }; })( window, document, 'script', );



Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Max Life partners IIA to offer insurance access to MSME workforce in UP



Max Life Insurance Company on Monday announced a partnership with the Indian Industries Association (IIA) to provide life insurance plans to the workforce of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSME) in Uttar Pradesh.


Under the recently announced Irdai’s State Insurance Plan, Max Life aims to enhance accessibility and drive insurance penetration across Uttar Pradesh, the insurer said in a release.


IIA has an extensive network across industrialized districts, it added.


“Through this partnership, we aim to reach the underserved population in Uttar Pradesh, the country’s most populous state, and financially secure the future of more than 11 lakh MSME workforce and their families,” said V Viswanand, Deputy Managing Director, Max Life Insurance.


Ashok Kumar Agarwal, President, Indian Industries Association said that for close to four decades, IIA has been working consistently towards creating an environment conducive to industrial growth, especially for MSMEs in India.


The activities will be undertaken with Sana Insurance Brokers as the enrolment partner to engage with the MSME workforce.


Max Life is the appointed lead insurer for Uttar Pradesh under Irdai’s State Insurance Plan.


Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) has undertaken an initiative to enhance the reach and accessibility of insurance products across all Indian states. As part of this initiative, the regulator has collaborated with state governments to identify a lead insurer for each district.


Max Life Insurance Company is a joint venture between Max Financial Services Limited and Axis Bank Limited. Max Financial Services is a part of Max Group.


IIA is an apex representative body of MSME.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Decoding the fine print of pension schemes: What’s good, bad, avoidable



As Karnataka gears up for the upcoming Assembly elections, poll promises by the grand old party include a slew of public welfare measures. The Congress’ road map for the impending elections, among other things like quota hike and repealing “unjust laws” made by the government, assures the return of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) within a year of helming the government.


The Karnataka Congress’ manifesto states that it will “sympathetically consider the extension of OPS to government servants that got inducted from 2006 onwards.”


Before delving into the details of the OPS, it is interesting to note that the alternate national party insists on the restoration of the older scheme against the New Pension Scheme (NPS).


Last year, the Congress government in Himachal Pradesh kept its promise in this regard, which it made before the Assembly elections. The northern state approved the restoration of OPS in its very first Cabinet meeting held earlier this year.


There are about 1.36 lakh employees including pensioners under the New Pension Scheme (NPS) in Himachal Pradesh.


However, as far as the Congress’ campaign in Himachal Pradesh went, it indicated that the party had gained significantly from promising to restore OPS.


While the OPS plank did not outrightly win Congress the Himachal election, it did give the party a last-mile advantage. But certainly, the promise of restoration of OPS makes an impact on government employees and their families, and even young voters aspiring for a government job.


Coming to the understanding of the NPS and how it differs from the OPS, it is fundamentally a change in the pension system introduced by the two rival national parties.


The National Pension System came into effect in 2004 after the Congress government introduced it in 2003. This claims to provide a defined contribution of pension for Indian citizens. The NPS was launched as an alternative with the purpose of providing a secure and stable retirement income.


A fundamental difference between the NPS and OPS is the extent of guaranteed pension provided to the beneficiary. The NPS provides no guaranteed pension, but OPS does, based on the individual’s last drawn salary and the number of years of service. For those looking for a guaranteed pension in their retirement, OPS is a more secure and stable method.


While OPS is open to government employees who have completed at least 10 years of service, NPS is open to all citizens of India between the ages of 18 and 60, and the pension received is based on the investment made by the person, and in turn, the returns generated by the pension funds. This scheme also provides for a life insurance cover of Rs 5 lakh for the subscriber.


Further, with respect to contribution, the NPS is more flexible than the OPS as under the former, one can choose to invest in a variety of pension funds, unlike in OPS, which is exclusively salary and service-period based.


Up to 14 per cent of the basic salary of a government employee and up to 10 per cent for the private sector employee can contribute for NPS. It is an advantage for an investor as this is over and above the 80C section of Rs 1.5 lakh.


Here, a Tier-2 account is not compulsory unlike the Tier-1 account where one gets tax benefits. Tier-2 can be treated like an investment which one can exit during the course of investment. The primary objective of Tier-1 is a long-term investment with tax savings, whereas for Tier-2, it is an investment.


After 60, one is free to withdraw — up to 60 per cent of withdrawal could be upfront and remaining could be converted into annuity. Additionally, as a benefit, one may choose their annuity partner.


At present, there happen to be eight different pension funds that provide the option of annuity.


The NPS sets forth two options before the investor: an active choice where a subscriber can decide the extent of his participation in equity and corporate debt — one can invest up to 75 per cent into equity and remaining could go into corporate debt/government security; and the second option for those preferring a predefined automated system whereby depending on one’s age, the asset allocation moves between equity and debt.


Considering which option is better, it depends on the risk-taking ability of the investor.


Technicalities of the two schemes apart, for the common man, the pension scheme is an instrument of social and financial security, and any tinkering with this is bound to affect the mood of the electorate and impact poll results.


 


(Kavya Dubey may be reached at kavya.d@ians.in)


–IANS


kvd/bg

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Brookfield, Tata Group in talks to invest in upcoming IPO of Nexus Malls



By M. Sriram and Rama Venkat


BENGALURU (Reuters) -Brookfield Asset Management and Tata Group are in talks to invest in the upcoming initial public offering (IPO) for Nexus Malls, betting that the Indian real estate investment trust will benefit from a rise in the country’s consumption levels, two sources told Reuters.


The IPO, the first-ever by an Indian retail REIT, comes at a time when volatile markets and global macroeconomic challenges have scuppered or delayed various listing plans in India.


Blackstone Inc-owned Nexus is seeking a valuation of about $3 billion and plans to raise about $390 million in the share sale, a newspaper advertisement showed on Wednesday.


Nexus Malls owns 17 commercial properties across 13 Indian cities. Apple Inc last month opened its second fully-owned store in India in a Nexus-owned shopping mall in New Delhi.


Indian conglomerate Tata Group is investing in the IPO via its unit Tata Investment Corporation , the sources, who did not want to be named because the discussions are private, said.


Other anchor investors include state-owned State Bank of India Life Insurance, SBI Mutual Fund, HDFC Life Insurance, HDFC Mutual Fund and Star Health Insurance, they added.


Apart from Canadian investment firm Brookfield, other foreign investors include U.S-based Jane Street and Asian fund Prusik Investment management, both the sources said.


Spokespersons for Nexus and Star Health declined to comment on the deal while others did not respond to queries seeking comment.


Nexus is betting on a “consumption mega trend” with malls recovering and growing reasonably fast post the pandemic-lockdowns, Nexus CEO Dalip Sehgal said at an IPO press conference in Mumbai on Wednesday.


Losses for the REIT narrowed to $1.34 million for the year ended March 31, 2022 from $24.45 million a year ago.


Axis Capital, IIFL Securities, BofA Securities India were among the book running lead managers to the IPO.


Nexus Malls is set to start trading on the stock exchanges on May 19.


($1 = 81.8150 Indian rupees)


(Reporting by Rama Venkat in Bengaluru; Editing by Janane Venkatraman, Sonia Cheema and Nivedita Bhattacharjee)

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Bobby Darling: Transgender-turned-woman Bobby Darling moves SC for same-sex marriage rights, ancillary issues | India News



NEW DELHI: A transgender-turned-woman has moved the Supreme Court seeking to intervene in the proceedings related to the adjudication of pleas for same-sex marriage rights before a five-judge bench and told the SC that same-sex marriage rights would be rendered meaningless without right to maintenance, alimony, succession and ancillary matrimonial rights.
Pakhi Sharma aka Bobby Darling, who as Pankaj Sharma underwent sex-reassignment operation to became a woman, had married a man and is now embroiled in several matrimony related litigations following alleged cruelty at the hands of her husband. A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud and justices Sanjay K Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and P S Narasimha will hear the case from April 18.
She told the SC in her intervention application that her “gender identity status as a ‘transwoman to woman’ put her at a more disadvantageous position than other biologically female women”. “At every stage of legal proceedings, she is faced with the challenge of answering the issues/questions pertaining to very maintainability of legal proceedings applicable to women, such as FIR under IPC Section 498A, proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, proceedings for dissolution of marriage and ancillary reliefs,” she said through advocate Meera Kaura. The SC had recently refused to entertain a PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay seeking uniform right to marriage, divorce, maintenance, alimony, adoption, succession and inheritance to women irrespective of their religion. It had said that it fell squarely within the legislative domain of Parliament. It would be interesting to watch the five-judge SC bench deal with the issue of right to marriage of same-sex couples.
Sharma claimed she has been subjected to various legal hurdles owing to her sexual orientation. “In view of the various problems undergone by the applicant, she submits that she may kindly be permitted to intervene in the matter and to support the cause of same-sex marriage… The interpersonal relationships of LGBTQI persons include the right to marry… and the rights incidental to such interpersonal relationships of LGBTQI persons would include the rights flowing from such interpersonal relationships, such as the right to adopt, the right to be recognised as a spouse for the purpose of succession, family laws, medical or life insurance claims, etc,” Sharma said. She said she wanted to assist the five-judge bench of the SC “for the cause of different genders and to request for legal sanctity of stable relations in the form of marriage.”
“Unless legal sanctity to such relationships is granted… the rights or protections flowing from such relationships, such as pensionary benefits are not given by the government in an arbitrary manner, which is violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution,” she said.





Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Rahul Gandhi’s disqualification shows BJP’s dictatorial mindset: Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel | India News



PM Narendra Modi can’t escape questions about Adani, and BJP’s resort to legal cover to disqualify Rahul from LS is a stark manifestation of its dictatorial attitude, Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel tells TOI’s Subodh Ghildiyal. Excerpts from the interview:
How do you see the whole drama about Rahul Gandhi’s disqualification?
This is dictatorial mindset of BJP. They are orchestrating an elaborate theatre to evade answering just one specific question — where did Rs 20,000 crore in Adani’s shell companies come from? Dictators around the world resort to such tactics — scare the opposition, put leaders in jail and disqualify them from Parliament. Rahul says “daromat” and they are out to scare him. The truth is that the dictator is worried as to what will happen if people stop being scared of him? The truth is the government was worried how long could they shut the Parliament just to stop Rahul from speaking.
BJP is alleging that Rahul insulted OBCs? Are Nirav Modi and Lalit Modi OBCs?
They are upper class. Modi surname is written by many, like Piloo Modi was a Parsi. My surname Baghel is used by tribals, Rajputs, even SCs in Chhattisgarh. I am an OBC. Yo u can project Congress in whatever light y ou want, but answer the question: who put Rs 20,000 crore in Adani’s companies.
Polls are due in Chhattisgarh this year and the state will be a focus area of BJP’s campaign that Rahul’s remark on Modi surname is anti-OBCs, like the PM’s appeal to Sahu community in 2019. How would you deal with it?
“Kaath ki handi ek bar chadti hai”. What has the PM done for Sahus or Telis or OBCs? They will not vote every time. If you are such a benefactor of OBCs, then why don’t you order “caste census”? Chhattisgarh’s bill increasing reservation for backwards and tribals is p ending with the governor for four months. If you are so sympathetic to OBCs, then get our bill approved. BJP’s national vicepresident Thakur Raman Singh called me a “Chhota aadmi”, and I am a CM and anOBC. In Bhanupratappur bypolls, Raman Singh called me “a rat, a dog, a cat” in public. This is the mindset of BJP’s Thakur Raman Singh about OBCs. The Modi government is targeting OBC leaders — Teja shwi Yadav, M Stalin, Akhilesh Yadav. In Chhattisgarh, the ED has made a permanent station. Are you doing anything good for OBCs, by action or attitude?
Congress made Rafale an issue but it did not fly with people? Will your focus on Adani have popular resonance?
This is a big issue. After Hindenburg report, Adani has fallen from second richest man to nobody knows which rank. The funds of LIC and SBI has been inv ested in Adani firms. The share value has fallen. The ED and I-T haven’t gone to Adani, while the opposition-governed states are raided daily. People will understand the truth. When water is released from dam, it takes time to reach the tail end.
How big a setback is Rahul’s disqualification for the party?
This is not a setback for Congress. It has proved how scared the Modi government is of Congress and Rahul.





Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Parliament: Adani and UK remarks issues stall Parliament yet again; war of words between BJP, Congress gets ugly: Top developments | India News



NEW DELHI: Several opposition party leaders on Tuesday held a protest in the corridors of Parliament and raised slogans demanding a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) probe into the Adani issue, even as the BJP accused the opposition MPs of repeatedly insulting Rajya Sabha Chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar and stalling the parliamentary process.
Both houses of Parliament adjourned early amid uproar over the Adani issue and demand by ruling party members that Rahul Gandhi apologise for his ‘democracy in danger’ remarks.

The opposition leaders also hung a banner that read “We want JPC” from the first floor of the Parliament building.
The House will meet again on March 23.
TMC MPs held a separate protest in the Parliament complex and demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi break his silence on the Adani issue.

Both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha have failed to transact any significant business so far due to the impasse during the second part of the Budget session of Parliament that started on March 13.
Here are the top developments:
Irresponsible Opposition wilfully stalling Parliament: Piyush Goyal
Union minister Piyush Goyal on Tuesday accused the Opposition of willfully stalling Parliament with its “irresponsible” comments and “unfounded” allegations to mislead the country amid global recognition of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership.

Goyal, joined by Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi, accused the Opposition of repeatedly insulting Rajya Sabha Chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar by refusing to even meet him.
Even on Tuesday, some parties including the Congress did not attend the meeting called by him. Though they were present in the meeting called by Speaker Om Birla, he alleged.
Kharge stopped from speaking: Congress
The Congress hit back at Goyal and said that the Leader of the House got “his MPs to prevent the Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge from speaking twice after the Chairman had permitted him”.

“Piyush Goyal is accusing Oppn of boycotting meeting called by Chairman RS. This is from the Leader of the House who got his MPs to prevent LoP Kharge ji from speaking twice after Chairman had permitted him. Silencing of LoP is also an issue quite apart from the JPC on Adani,” Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said on Twitter.
In another tweet, Ramesh said, “How can the Oppn demand for a JPC into the PM-linked Adani scam be linked to the BJP’s demand for an apology from Rahul Gandhi on totally baseless accusations. The JPC is on a real, documented scam. The apology demand is a hoax being raised to divert attention from the Adani scam.”
Ramesh said this morning Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha, Kharge was given permission by the Chairman to speak and got up to do so but was not allowed by sloganeering BJP MPs. “Chairman then adjourned RS. How can the logjam be broken if Modi Government behaves like this,” he said.
Rahul present-day Mir Jafar: BJP
BJP leader Sambit Patra hit out at Congress MP Rahul Gandhi and said that he is the “present-day Mir Jafar” of Indian Polity and said that he has to apologise for his remarks in the UK.
Mir Jafar was a military general who betrayed Siraj ud-Daulah and helped the East India Company in the battle of Plassey in June 1757. Siraj was captured soon thereafter and later executed.
“He always defames the nation. He is the present-day Mir Jafar of Indian Polity,” Patra said, adding: “He insulted the country and ask the foreign power to intervene in the country. This is a consistent ‘conspiracy’ of Congress and Rahul Gandhi. His participation is least in Parliament and he says that no one allows him to speak.”
Patra further said: “Mir Zafar did the same thing, he gave 24 Parganas to get help from East India Company and now Rahul is doing the same kind of politics.”
“He is asking for help from foreign countries to become ‘Sahzada’ in India, Patra added.
Further, attacking Gandhi on his remarks of saying ‘unfortunately I’m an MP,’ Patra said, “Rahul Gandhi doesn’t know what to say. He speaks only with the help of Jairam Ramesh. He himself said that ‘unfortunately I am an MP”.
Criticising government is not criticising the nation: Congress
Congress leader Pawan Khera on Tuesday slammed BJP leader Sambit Patra after the latter compared Rahul Gandhi with Mir Jafar and said that he would soon get a “strong answer”.

While talking to the mediapersons, Khera said, “Criticizing government is not criticizing the nation. Government should understand this. The debate does not make democracy weaken instead it strengthens it. The government is doing this drama because they are trying to escape the opposition’s questions.”
“They are worried that Rahul Gandhi might again ask the PM about his relations with Adani. There is no JPC probe yet, this is the reason they are creating so much drama,” he added.
He added, “He will get a strong answer soon. We are also learning from them (BJP) how to give answers. Soon action will be done on his statement.”
Taking a barb at the BJP, he said the party will be seen as “Jai Chands” in history and claimed its ideological forefathers were known apologisers of the British.
A fictional account of King Jayachandra (aka Jaichand) occurs in a legendary text

Prithviraj Raso

.
The epic poem was likely written centuries after his death. According to this account, he was a rival of King Prithviraj Chauhan.
His daughter Samyukta eloped with Prithviraj against his wishes, and he allied with the foreign non-Hindu Ghurids to ensure Prithviraj’s downfall.
The name “Jaichand” became synonymous with the word “traitor” in folklore of northern India because of this legend.
Rahul writes to Lok Sabha Speaker
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has asserted that he has the right to respond in Parliament to the “totally baseless” and “unfair charges” hurled at him by senior ministers in the Lok Sabha over his democracy remarks.
In a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, Gandhi invoked Rule 357 which allows for “personal explanations” and also cited the example of BJP MP and then minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, who invoked the Rule to give an explanation regarding comments made by Jyotiraditya Scindia in relation to him in Parliament

“I am making such a request again. I am seeking this permission under the conventions of Parliamentary practice, the constitutionally embedded rules of natural justice and Rule 357 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha,” he said in his letter to the Speaker.
The Congress leader said members of the ruling regime have made “scurrilous and defamatory claims against me” both within and outside Parliament.
“As a result of these allegations, and the rules invoked by these individuals, it is only appropriate that you kindly allow me a right to reply as contained in Rule 357 which allows for ‘personal explanations’,” he said.

Gandhi’s democracy remarks have triggered a massive political row, with the BJP accusing him of maligning India on foreign soil and seeking foreign interventions and the Congress hitting back, citing instances of PM Modi raising internal politics abroad.
During his interactions in the United Kingdom recently, Gandhi had alleged that the structures of Indian democracy are under attack and there is a “full-scale assault” on the country’s institutions.
TMC holds separate protest
TMC MPs held a separate protest in the Parliament complex and demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi break his silence on the Adani issue.
Accusing the government of helping businessman Gautam Adani by not ordering a probe into allegations of fraud levelled against his group, the party demanded that Adani be arrested.
“Adani should be arrested. Modi is trying to protect Adani in the Rs 1 lakh crore scam. This is also the reason why they are not allowing any discussion in Parliament. The TMC leadership has already demanded that the 10 non-BJP states should begin their own probe into this and ensure that public money is not misused,” said TMC Rajya Sabha MP Derek O’Brien.
TMC Lok Sabha MP Sudip Bandyopadhyay demanded an explanation from the prime minister on how public money was used by Adani. “PM Modi should explain this in the House. How LIC-SBI money ended up with Adani,” he said.
Next sitting on March 23
Lok Sabha Chair Rajendra Agarwal wished MPs for various festivals, including Chaitra Sukhladi, Gudi Padwa, Ugadi, Cheti Chand, Navre and Sajibu Cheiraoba.
He also said on the request of several members to enable them to participate in the festivities, the House will not have a sitting on Wednesday and instead it would meet on March 23.
(With inputs from agencies)
Watch Opposition parties protest inside Parliament amid Adani row, demand JPC probe





Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Row over Rahul: Parliament’s first week post recess one of least productive | India News


NEW DELHI: Both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned for the day on Friday due to slogan-shouting by the opposition and protests by BJP members over Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s “democracy under threat” remarks in London recently.
The first week of the second leg of the budget session in Lok Sabha was one of the least productive as proceedings were stalled for five days in a row with BJP insisting on an apology from Rahul and the Opposition seeking a joint parliamentary committee (JPC) probe into the Adani issue.

Didn’t say anything anti-India, will speak inside Parliament if they allow: Rahul Gandhi

Barring one occasion when the entire Rajya Sabha came together to hail Oscar awards for “Natu Natu” song from the film “RRR” and documentary “The Elephant Whisperers”, even the upper House remained in limbo through the week.

BJP leaders on Rahul Gandhi’s statement: Unfortunately we are at a loss for words

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla urged all the MPs to bring the House in order so that the day’s business could be taken up. “You all have been sent by your electorate to take part in proceedings and not for slogan-shouting. I can’t run the house until it is in order,” Birla said before adjourning the House 15 minutes later.
In Rajya Sabha, soon after the listing of papers, Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar said he had received 11 adjournment notices which were disallowed. Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge sought to speak but was not allowed, triggering an uproar by opposition members.
BJP chief spokesperson Anil Baluni said Congress and opposition parties were solely responsible for the current impasse in Parliament. “The statement made by Rahul Gandhi in London was an attack on Indian democracy. People of the country are agitated and so are the parliamentarians,” Baluni said and added, “The MPs not only from BJP but also a section in the opposition are petrified at the language Rahul Gandhi used on foreign soil against sovereignty and integrity of the country.”
He said there is anger across the country and Rahul Gandhi must tender an apology to the nation.
In Rajya Sabha, opposition MPs Neeraj Dangi, Akhilesh Prasad Singh, Kumar Ketkar, Syed Naseer Hussain, Amee Yajnik and Santosh Kumar P had given notices to discuss the government’s failure to constitute a JPC on charges of corporate fraud, stock market manipulation and financial mismanagement against the Adani Group.
Notices were also given by Ranjeet Ranjan, KC Venugopal, Sanjay Singh and Pramod Tiwari to discuss the government’s “questionable” role in promoting the business interests of the Adani Group. Dhankhar said Elamaram Kareem has raised a demand to discuss the Hindenburg report on the Adani Group, which has put government deposits in public-sector banks and LIC in danger.





Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here

Categories
Delhi News

Lok Sabha proceedings last just 3 minutes as logjam over Rahul Gandhi remarks continues for 4th day | India News


NEW DELHI: Ruckus over Rahul Gandhi’s remarks in the UK stalled both Houses of Parliament for the fourth consecutive day on Thursday with Lok Sabha proceedings lasting barely three minutes and the Rajya Sabha, too, failing to transact any business.
Rahul’s arrival in the Lok Sabha in the afternoon was greeted with loud shouts of “Aa gaya! Aa gaya!” from a handful of BJP MPs even as the House was adjourned within a minute after it reconvened at 2pm.
Kirit Solanki, who was in the chair, urged members to be seated and stop the sloganeering if they want a debate but the opposition and treasury benches continued with their slogan-shouting and the House was then adjourned for the day.

Didn’t say anything anti-India, will speak inside Parliament if they allow: Rahul Gandhi

In the morning session, the House proceedings had lasted only for two minutes. Trinamool Congress members, with their mouths covered with a black ribbon, had gathered in the well of the House as the proceedings got under way. Speaker Om Birla urged the members to allow the House to function, but to no avail. Similar scenes played out in the Rajya Sabha with BJP insisting on an apology from Rahul for his London remarks and opposition members demanding a joint parliamentary committee probe into the investment of public money in the Adani Group through institutions like LIC and SBI.
When the House re-assembled in the afternoon, several members had already gathered in the well.
Deputy chairman Harivansh asked the members to return to their respective seats and allow the proceedings to continue.
As the members continued to shout, he adjourned the House for the day. Earlier in the day, TMC members raised slogans saying they were not being allowed to speak and wore black masks as a mark of protest.





Source link

For more information call us at 9891563359.
We are a group of best insurance advisors in Delhi. We are experts in LIC and have received number of awards.
If you are near Delhi or Rohini or Pitampura Contact Us Here